Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: First Radio Signal Detected Directly From an Exoplanet

Somewhere 63 light-years from Earth, a giant planet is putting on a light show so powerful we can hear it. Astronomers have, for the first time, traced a radio signal directly to an exoplanet rather than its star: repeating bursts of auroral radio emission from Beta Pictoris b, a gas giant roughly a dozen times Jupiter’s mass. The detection, made with South Africa’s MeerKAT radio telescope array, was reported this week and is already being called a landmark in observational astronomy.

How they caught it

Finding radio waves from an exoplanet is a needle-in-a-haystack problem with a twist: the needle and the haystack both glow. Stars are loud in radio. The team, led by graduate student Kevin Ortiz Ceballos of the Center for Astrophysics (Harvard and Smithsonian) with colleagues at the University of Oregon, had to prove the bursts came from the planet and not from Beta Pictoris itself.

Their calibration trick was elegant. Across four observing sessions in 2025 and 2026, they lined up their radio images against distant quasars, objects so far away they barely appear to move, using them as fixed pins on the sky. With that grid in place, the emission sat squarely on the planet. The signal carried strong circular polarization, the calling card of electron cyclotron maser emission, the same physics behind auroral radio bursts at Jupiter, Saturn, and Earth. In plain terms: this is a northern-lights broadcast from another world.

A magnetic field, measured from 63 light-years away

Here is the part that made astronomers sit up. The highest-frequency emission the team recorded implies a magnetic field of at least 1,250 gauss at the emitting region. Earth’s surface field is about half a gauss. Jupiter, the heavyweight of our solar system, tops out around 4 to 14 gauss depending on where you measure. Beta Pictoris b dwarfs them both by a staggering margin.

That number matters because magnetic fields are planetary armor. They deflect the charged particle streams pouring off a star, shielding the atmosphere from being stripped away over billions of years. When astronomers eventually hunt for habitable worlds, a magnetic field reading could become one of the first boxes they check. This is the first time anyone has measured one directly on a planet beyond our solar system.

The system itself is a beauty: Beta Pictoris b is only about 23 million years old, a baby by cosmic standards, still warm from its formation. The star hosts at least two more planets and a broad disk of gas and dust that may one day settle into a Kuiper Belt of its own. Its star is magnetically quiet, which is precisely what made the planet’s own signal stand out.

A fair note on the science

The paper has not yet completed peer review; it was posted as a preprint on September 15. That is worth saying plainly. Preprints are how fast-moving astronomy works these days, but the findings will face scrutiny before they enter the textbooks. The team’s calibration against quasars and the four separate observing sessions give the result real weight, and independent teams will surely try to reproduce it with other arrays.

What this unlocks

The practical payoff goes beyond one planet. If auroral radio emission can be picked up across dozens of light-years, astronomers suddenly have a new way to take a distant world’s vital signs. Magnetic fields, rotation periods, even hints about atmospheric composition could, in principle, be read from the radio dial. Teams are already talking about aiming the same technique at other young, massive exoplanets, and at the ultracool dwarf stars that sit on the blurry line between stars and planets.

There is a broader lesson in the method, too. The detection hinged on patience: four observing sessions spread across two years, and a calibration scheme clever enough to tell planet from star. Breakthroughs in astronomy increasingly look like this, not a single eureka night but a slow accumulation of careful measurements until the signal stands up and introduces itself.

Why this one feels different

Astronomy has given us a decade of firsts: first image of a black hole’s shadow, first gravitational waves, first atmospheric chemistry on distant worlds. But there is something unusually intimate about this one. We are not looking at Beta Pictoris b. We are listening to it. A magnetosphere flexing, auroras crackling at the poles of a world no human will ever visit, and the physics is the same physics that paints green curtains across Arctic skies. Stand under a dark sky sometime this fall (the city’s holiday lights season is about to begin, and Radio City’s own light show returns before long, but the real show is the one that never turns off) and remember: the universe is humming. Now, for the first time, we’ve picked out one voice in the choir and traced it home.

Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: Digger Review: Tom Cruise’s Wild New Comedy Arrives Oct 2

Tomorrow, October 2, Tom Cruise stops running. He starts digging.

Digger, Alejandro G. Inarritu’s satirical black comedy for Warner Bros., opens in theaters and IMAX this Friday, and it might be the strangest big swing a major studio has taken in years. Cruise plays Digger Rockwell, described as the most powerful man in the world: an aging oil tycoon who sets off on a frantic mission to prove he can save humanity from the very disaster his drilling unleashed. The tagline says it all. A comedy of catastrophic proportions.

If that sounds like a lot, good. It is supposed to.

The setup

The film is a Legendary Pictures production, directed by Inarritu from a screenplay he wrote with Oscar winners Alexander Dinelaris and Nicolas Giacobone, his Birdman collaborators, plus Sabina Berman. The story is credited to Berman, Inarritu and Jez Butterworth. It runs 129 minutes, cost somewhere between $160 and $180 million, and was shot entirely in VistaVision, the wide, lush format Inarritu favors.

The premise reads like a dare. The richest man alive breaks the planet, then demands credit for trying to fix it. Around him orbits an ensemble that most directors would trade a kidney for: Riz Ahmed, John Goodman, Sandra Huller, Michael Stuhlbarg and Jesse Plemons, with Emma D’Arcy, Sophie Wilde, Robert John Burke and Burn Gorman in support. Behind the camera, the cavalry is just as stacked: cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki, editors Stephen Mirrione and Conor O’Neill, production designer Dennis Gassner, composer Cosmo Sheldrake. Count the Oscars in that paragraph and you will run out of fingers.

Why this one is fascinating

This is Cruise’s first film under the Warner Bros. deal he signed in January 2026, and his first real collaboration with the studio since Edge of Tomorrow more than a decade ago. It is also Inarritu’s first English-language feature since The Revenant. Two heavyweights, both overdue for a new chapter, choosing to make a wild comedy about an oil baron trying to outrun his own mess. Nobody saw this coming, which is exactly the point.

Inarritu has described the shoot as joyful chaos. At Cannes he called it “insane” and said Cruise made him laugh every day, praising a comic range he had never seen from the star. A poster designed by artist Ed Ruscha was recently celebrated at LACMA. The studio is treating this like an event, not a release.

Early reactions are genuinely divided, and Warner Bros. is leaning into it. A new ad runs contradictory pull quotes side by side: masterpiece next to unpleasant, brilliant next to baffling, tied together with the line “Same film, different truth.” You can read that as marketing spin or as honesty. Either way, it takes confidence to sell a movie this way.

A comedy built like an epic

The craft here deserves its own paragraph. Inarritu shot the film over six months in the United Kingdom, entirely in VistaVision, a format that gives the image a depth and grain modern digital rarely manages. Lubezki’s involvement alone guarantees it will look like nothing else in the multiplex this fall. Even the marketing has an art-house streak: the key poster was designed by renowned American artist Ed Ruscha and was recently celebrated at LACMA, which is not a sentence you usually write about a Tom Cruise vehicle.

Cruise himself looks unrecognizable in the materials released so far: paunchy, weathered, clutching a decrepit cat on the poster. For a star whose brand is control, letting himself look this undone is the boldest special effect in the movie.

Should you go?

Here is the case for yes. Studios do not make $170 million original comedies anymore. They make sequels, and prequels, and sequels to prequels. When one of the last true movie stars and one of the great living directors decide to spend that kind of money on something nobody asked for, the only correct response is curiosity. The worst version of this movie is still more interesting than the safest franchise entry of the year.

See it big if you can. Lubezki shooting VistaVision is reason enough, and whatever you think of the satire, you will not be bored. Cruise, famously, does not do bored.

Make a day of it. Grab one of NYC’s best breakfast sandwiches before the show, then argue about the ending over hot chicken after. Digger opens October 2 in theaters and IMAX. Go decide for yourself.

Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: Armadin Raises $255.5M at $2.5B for Agentic AI Security

There is a particular kind of founder who only needs a name. Kevin Mandia is one of them. The man who built Mandiant into the firm governments called when things went badly, and who sold it to Google, has a new company. And investors just handed it a quarter of a billion dollars to teach AI to think like a hacker, in defense of the good guys.

Armadin announced on October 1 that it has raised $255.5 million in Series B funding at a valuation of more than $2.5 billion. The round was co-led by Andreessen Horowitz and Accel, with new money from Bain Capital Ventures and Redpoint, plus a deep bench of returning backers: Google Ventures, Kleiner Perkins, Menlo Ventures, In-Q-Tel, 8VC, and Ballistic Ventures. Total funding now sits at $445 million, for a company that only emerged from stealth seven months ago.

The core idea: fight AI with AI

Let’s be honest about the problem first, because it’s the kind of thing that usually gets framed with doom. Frontier AI models have compressed the time between a vulnerability being disclosed and a working exploit appearing. What used to take attackers weeks can now take hours. The old defenses, a penetration test twice a year and a scanner that spits out a list of findings, were built for a slower world.

Armadin’s answer is an inversion that feels obvious once you hear it: deploy an autonomous swarm of specialized AI agents that reason like a skilled adversary. Not a scanner that flags individual issues in isolation, but agents that chain individually low-severity weaknesses into full, validated attack paths. The company’s description of a kill chain is worth quoting in plain terms: it can run from unauthenticated remote code execution at the perimeter, through lateral movement inside the network, to full cloud compromise. The point is the chain, not the links. Scanners score each finding on its own and miss how they connect. Attackers don’t.

This is the part that should make security teams sit up. Armadin says security teams get to see the exact attack paths an adversary would use in production, with the blast radius of each mapped out, and can cut those paths before anyone exploits them. In other words: you get to watch the heist in rehearsal and lock the doors it would have used.

Why this raise matters right now

Two things make the timing notable. First, seven months after emerging from stealth, the company says it’s already running agentic attack campaigns in production for Fortune 500 enterprises and government customers. That is a very fast path from stealth to production, and it suggests the demand side is urgent. Enterprises aren’t buying a vision here; they’re buying capacity.

Second, the money flooding into AI-native defense is becoming one of the defining investment themes of 2026. Investors have been pouring capital into early-stage startups building protections against AI-driven cyberattacks all year. A $255.5 million Series B at a $2.5B-plus valuation is among the largest raises the category has ever seen, and the investor list reads like a vote of confidence in both the founder and the thesis.

Mandia’s pedigree is doing real work here. He has sold a security company to Google before, and he has been on the receiving end of the nastiest incident-response calls in the industry. When he says periodic testing can’t keep pace anymore, it lands differently than when a first-time founder says it. The track record is the pitch.

The “good-guy red team” model

Zoom out and Armadin represents a structural shift in how security gets bought. The traditional model is expertise-as-a-service: hire a red team for a few weeks, get a report, fix what you can, repeat next year. It’s episodic, expensive, and the attackers don’t take semesters off.

The agentic model is expertise-as-software: the adversary simulation never stops. The swarm keeps probing, keeps chaining findings, keeps updating the map of how an attacker would actually get in. For a Fortune 500 company with cloud estates that change daily, continuous is the only honest answer. Your infrastructure doesn’t pause between pen tests. Why should your testing?

There is a nuance worth holding onto. These systems are powerful, and power in security tooling always raises the dual-use question. But the framing here is firmly defensive: the agents find the paths, the security team closes them. The company exists to make the defense faster than the offense. In a year when AI safety has been a constant drumbeat, a well-capitalized defense-first company is good news for everyone who isn’t an attacker.

What to watch next

Three things will determine whether this raise is remembered as a landmark or just a big number.

Proof of production value. The Fortune 500 claim is the one to watch. If Armadin can show that continuous agentic testing measurably shrinks the window of exposure, competitors will have to match the model, and the whole pen-testing industry reorganizes around it.

The talent magnet effect. $445 million in total funding, a Mandia-led company, and a mission that reads like a spy novel: this is a recruiting machine. In a security talent market that has been brutally tight for years, that matters. The best defenders are going where the hardest problems are.

Pricing the defense premium. Right now, agentic security is enterprise-only by economics. The question is how fast the model gets cheap enough for the mid-market companies that are actually the softest targets. The sooner that happens, the bigger the dent in the attack economy.

The takeaway

Strip away the funding theatrics and the story is simple. The same AI advances that made attacks faster are now being aimed at defense, by one of the most credible security founders alive, with a quarter-billion dollars of fresh fuel. The attackers have had the momentum. This is the market voting, loudly, that the defenders are catching up.

If you’re in New York this week and security talk over dinner sounds fun (it is, trust me), there’s a full lineup of things to do across the city to pair with the conversation. And if the funding news has you dreaming of your own security startup, fuel up properly first: NYC’s best breakfast sandwiches are a fine place to sketch a pitch deck.

Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: Rapamycin Boosts Brain Blood Flow in Alzheimer’s Risk Group

For the 25 million or so people worldwide who carry the APOE4 gene variant, the statistics have always felt like a sentence handed down early. Carry one copy of the variant and your lifetime risk of Alzheimer’s climbs roughly threefold; carry two and it climbs much higher. Yet the disease itself may not show up for decades. A new study out this week suggests that window, the long quiet stretch between risk and illness, might be exactly where medicine should aim.

Researchers at the University of Missouri gave a small group of healthy middle-aged adults a low daily dose of rapamycin, a drug long used to prevent organ transplant rejection, for four weeks. The twist: only the nine participants who carried APOE4 showed the benefit. Their cerebral blood flow rose by more than 15 percent across multiple brain regions. The fourteen non-carriers saw no significant change.

What the trial actually measured

Ai-Ling Lin, a professor in the School of Medicine and an investigator at the university’s Roy Blunt NextGen Precision Health building, designed the study around a simple observation. People with APOE4 tend to show reduced blood flow in certain brain regions years, sometimes decades, before memory problems appear. Dimmed circulation has long been treated as an early warning sign. Lin’s question was whether it could also be an early treatment target.

The participants, all between 45 and 65 and cognitively normal, took one milligram of rapamycin daily. Along with the blood-flow gains, the APOE4 group showed calmer inflammatory markers and healthier metabolic profiles, with minimal side effects. The paper, published in the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, frames the result as a proof of precision medicine: the right drug, for the right biology, at the right time.

Why blood flow matters more than we thought

Alzheimer’s research spent years fixated on amyloid plaques, the sticky protein clumps found in patients’ brains. Billions went into clearing them, with underwhelming results. Blood flow was the boring cousin of the field, harder to measure, less dramatic to describe.

That is changing. The brain burns roughly a fifth of the body’s energy despite weighing about three pounds, and it has no meaningful fuel reserve. When its plumbing underperforms, neurons starve in slow motion. Lin’s earlier mouse studies showed rapamycin could slow brain aging and restore circulation in APOE4 mice; the human data now rhymes with it. Improved flow means better waste clearance, better nutrient delivery, and a blood-brain barrier under less strain.

Rapamycin itself is no newcomer. Discovered in soil bacteria on Easter Island, it has been prescribed for decades. Repurposing an approved drug with a known safety profile is far faster than building a new molecule from scratch, which is part of why geroscientists have watched this class of compounds so closely. Lin’s group is already thinking about the next questions: how long the blood-flow gains persist after the four weeks end, whether the effect scales with dose, and, eventually, whether better plumbing actually translates into sharper memory years down the line. Those are the right questions, asked in the right order.

A stroll through one of the city’s many lively street fairs won’t replace medicine, but staying socially and physically active is exactly the kind of low-tech brain support the science keeps endorsing.

What comes next

Let’s keep the excitement honest. Twenty-three people is a pilot study, not a prescription. Four weeks is a blink. The trial measured blood flow and biomarkers, not memory scores or dementia rates, and those outcomes will need years of follow-up in much larger groups. Nobody should ask their doctor for rapamycin off-label on the strength of one paper, and Lin herself frames the work as a starting point, not a finish line.

Still, the direction is genuinely new. Instead of waiting for damage and trying to reverse it, the field is learning to spot the earliest wobble in the system and steady it. Genotype-specific responses, drugs matched to a person’s biology rather than their diagnosis, represent the kind of medicine Alzheimer’s prevention has been missing. And there is something quietly hopeful about the timing: the intervention worked best in healthy people who had no symptoms at all. Prevention, it turns out, may begin long before anyone thinks they are sick.

Small steps, taken early, have a way of adding up. A brisk morning walk, a real breakfast instead of a skipped one (the city’s breakfast sandwich game is stronger than ever), a conversation that keeps your mind turning, all of it feeds the same three-pound engine this study is trying to protect. Medicine may soon have one more tool for the job. The rest of the work is ours.

Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: Treasure Island: Ridley Scott’s 2027 Pirate Epic Preview

Some release dates are routine calendar housekeeping. Then Sony drops Ridley Scott and Hugh Jackman on a pirate movie and suddenly the whole industry is paying attention. This week the studio confirmed that its new take on Treasure Island will hit theaters on November 11, 2027, anchoring a late-year one-two punch alongside the newly dated 24 Jump Street.

It is the newest major announcement on the board, and frankly the most interesting one. Scott, at 88, keeps choosing projects like a man with half his career ahead of him. Jackman keeps picking roles that dare people to underestimate him. Put them together on Robert Louis Stevenson’s 1883 novel and you get the kind of old-school movie event that doesn’t come around often anymore.

What Sony actually confirmed

The details that are locked in: Scott directs and produces. Jackman leads the cast. The screenplay comes from Jack Thorne, who co-created Netflix’s acclaimed Adolescence and wrote the stage play Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. The cast also includes Hugh Grant and Adolescence breakout Owen Cooper, whose roles have not been specified yet.

The story is the one every schoolkid knows. A young boy finds a map to a legendary buried treasure, sets out on a perilous sea voyage, and ends up locked in a battle of wits with the charismatic, treacherous Long John Silver. Different outlets disagree on exactly which pirate Jackman is playing, with some naming Silver and others Blackbeard, so we will wait for Sony’s official word on that. What is certain is that this is a serious, grown-up treatment. Forget the felt pirates. The Muppets had their turn.

Why this pairing matters

Scott does not make small pictures, and he does not make them for long. His filmography is a wall of epics: Alien, Blade Runner, Gladiator, Napoleon. He shoots fast, he builds worlds you can smell, and he has a particular gift for making history feel like it is happening right now, with dirt under its fingernails.

Jackman, for his part, has spent the back half of his career proving range is not a rumor. Wolverine made him a star; The Greatest Showman made him a song-and-dance man; Logan made him an actor critics had to take seriously. A pirate role under Scott’s direction gives him a stage big enough for all of it. He has played a pirate before, in 2015’s Pan, but that was a cartoon villain in a cartoon movie. This sounds like something else entirely.

And then there is Thorne. Hiring the man who wrote Adolescence, one of the most talked-about television events of 2025, tells you Sony wants this to be a character piece with a pulse, not a theme-park ride with sails. The best pirate stories were always about greed and loyalty wearing costumes. Thorne knows how to write that.

The pirate competition

Here is the wrinkle. Scott’s Treasure Island will not be the only version in town. A six-part series starring Hayley Atwell, with David Oyelowo as Long John Silver, is headed to streaming this October via MGM+ and Paramount+. That puts more than a year between the two adaptations, and honestly, the contrast could help both. Television does the slow burn. Scott does the spectacle. Audiences who binge the series in October will be primed for the big screen version in November 2027.

It is also worth noting the calendar company Sony is keeping. 24 Jump Street lands December 10, 2027, with Jonah Hill, Channing Tatum and Ice Cube reportedly returning and Rodney Rothman directing. Two wildly different films, one month apart: pirate epic, then self-aware comedy sequel. That is a studio with confidence.

The bottom line

We are more than a year out, and plenty can change. Productions shift, dates move, casts evolve. But the bones of this are strong: a master director, a star at the height of his powers, a writer with genuine literary chops, and one of the great adventure stories ever written. If you only follow one 2027 release date, make it this one.

Until November 2027, there are plenty of adventures closer to home. This week’s lineup of books, jazz, salsa and night markets will keep any explorer busy, and the city’s 2026 holiday tree and lights celebrations are already on the calendar. Yo ho ho, indeed.

Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: Google Unveils Gemini 4 Argon, 1M-Token Frontier Model

On September 30, Google announced Gemini 4 Argon, the first flagship of its new Gemini 4 generation, with one message: we’re back at the frontier, and we’re cheaper than everyone else standing there.

The timing matters. Google spent most of 2026 being written off as behind. While OpenAI and Anthropic kept shipping new top models, Google’s own Gemini 3.5 Pro, promised for June, never arrived. Argon is the moment that posture flips.

What Argon actually is

Argon is the biggest model Google has ever released, larger than its previous line of “Pro” models, and built for what the company calls complex workloads: serious software engineering, heavy knowledge work, and cybersecurity defense. Google says it sees Argon as comparable to OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Opus line on key coding and cyber benchmarks, and on several of its own reported metrics it comes out ahead.

The benchmark sheet is worth a look: 77.9% on DeepSWE v1.1, a tough software-engineering test, beating GPT-6 Astra; 91.7% on LVBench for long-video understanding; 68% on CWE-bench v1 for vulnerability remediation. It lagged on a couple of coding benchmarks, so not a clean sweep. But the picture is a model that belongs in the top tier rather than chasing it.

Then there’s the headline spec: a 1 million token output limit. Industry watchers are calling it the leading output window in the business, and it’s an order of magnitude jump from the 64,000 tokens prior Gemini models topped out at. Output tokens are the ones that matter for getting work done. A long input window lets a model read the whole codebase; a long output window lets it actually rewrite it in one go.

Why a million tokens of output changes the math

Here’s the thing most coverage will gloss over. In the era of agents, output length is the binding constraint on autonomy. A model that can only emit a few pages before stopping is a model that has to be babysat: run it, catch where it stopped, feed the result back in, repeat.

A 1M-token output window turns the model from a chatbot into something that can run an entire long-horizon job in one trajectory. Think full code migrations, deep research reports assembled end to end, complete vulnerability remediation chains where the model finds the bug, writes the patch, and explains the fix without being asked to continue. For developers, that is the difference between an assistant and a coworker. The cost of supervision is the hidden tax on AI adoption, and Argon just cut it dramatically.

The price undercut is the real headline

But the number that will move markets and product roadmaps is the price. During its introductory period, Argon costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with cached input running about 95% cheaper. After the intro window, it steps up to $4 and $20. Compare that with GPT-6 Astra’s $10 and $50, and you see the strategy: Google is selling a frontier-class model at roughly a fifth of the flagship competition.

This is a page straight out of the cloud playbook. When you can’t win the hype cycle, you win the procurement cycle. Enterprises that balked at running agentic workflows on $50-per-million-output tokens can suddenly afford to let models run long. And long-running is exactly what Argon’s 1M-token window is built for. The two announcements rhyme on purpose: the price unlocks the capability.

Watch for the ripple effects. Anthropic and OpenAI now have to decide whether flagship pricing is a brand position or a volume business. My bet: the top end of the market gets cheaper fast, and the winners are the builders who were waiting on the sidelines for the math to work. If you’ve got a side project or a startup idea that needed long agent runs, the barrier just got a lot lower.

First in line: the cyber defenders

Google is doing something unusual with the rollout. There is no public release date. First access goes to trusted cyber-defense teams through the company’s Fairwind Program, and Google is also participating in a voluntary US government pre-release review process. Phased, cautious, deliberate.

It sounds like a constraint, but it’s actually the launch story. Argon can autonomously discover, validate, and patch software vulnerabilities, and one of the early testers, Wiz’s “Scan for Good” program, reportedly used it to find a critical flaw in software used by hospitals worldwide that other advanced models had missed. That’s a better launch narrative than any benchmark table: the new flagship’s first public job was protecting hospitals.

This is also smart positioning in a year when AI safety has dominated headlines. Releasing the most capable model to defenders first reframes caution as a feature. Wider access follows for paid API customers and Google AI Ultra subscribers, so the rest of us get our turn. The message to the security community, though, is clear: Google wants to be the company you call before you call the attackers.

What this means for builders

Three practical readouts, whether you’re a developer, a founder, or just AI-curious.

The price war at the top is now official. Flagship models at commodity prices changes what gets built. Long-horizon agents, full-document reasoning, autonomous coding pipelines: all of it gets dramatically cheaper to run. If you shelved an idea because inference costs didn’t pencil out, run the numbers again at $2 and $10.

Output windows are the new frontier metric. For a year the industry competed on input context: who could read the most. Argon shifts the contest to output: who can do the most before tapping out. Expect every lab to follow. When you’re evaluating models for agentic work, ask about the output cap, not just the input.

Security-first rollouts may become the norm. The Fairwind approach, trusted defenders before the general public, gives labs a credible answer to the safety question while still shipping. It’s a template. And if your company handles sensitive systems, getting into these trusted-tester programs is now a strategic move, not just an early-access perk.

One honest caveat: benchmarks are self-reported, and Google’s numbers come from Google. The real test will be independent evaluations and, more importantly, what developers actually build once they get their hands on it. Capability claims are cheap; shipping is the audit.

The bigger picture

Step back and the arc of 2026 comes into focus. The year opened with labs competing on who had the smartest model. It’s ending with them competing on who can run it cheapest, longest, and most safely. That’s a maturing market, not a hype cycle.

If Argon delivers in the wild the way it reads on paper, the “Google is behind” conversation is over. And the real winners aren’t the labs. They’re the developers and businesses who just got frontier AI at a fifth of the price.

If you’re in New York and want to chew this over with actual humans, what’s happening across the city this week includes plenty of places to talk tech over something better than a chat window. And if the price war has you building all night, you might want to know where to find the city’s best burritos for fuel.

Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: 20 Haunted Houses In and Around NYC to Brave This Halloween

Spooky season is officially here, and New York doesn’t do Halloween halfway. From massive professional scare attractions to elaborate home haunts tucked away in quiet neighborhoods, the five boroughs and beyond are stacked with places built to make you scream — the good kind.

Some of these are full walkthroughs with live actors, animatronics and jump scares. Others are residential home haunts that neighbors spend all year perfecting. Either way, here’s where to get your fix this October.

Manhattan: Blood Manor

Blood Manor is the name that comes up every year in conversations about NYC’s scariest walkthroughs, and this season is no different. This Manhattan haunt is one of the city’s best-known professional scare attractions, packed with live actors and detailed sets. If you only brave one haunted house this year, plenty of locals would point you here.

Brooklyn: Ridgewood Asylum

Over in Brooklyn, Ridgewood Asylum delivers the full asylum-horror experience — dark corridors, live performers and the kind of jump scares that stick with you on the subway ride home. It has a loyal following among Brooklyn horror fans who go back year after year.

Queens: A Haunting in Hollis

Queens gets its frights from A Haunting in Hollis, a homegrown haunt that has become a neighborhood staple. It’s the kind of place that reminds you the scariest experiences sometimes live on a regular residential block.

The Bronx: Fright on Flint

The Bronx brings Fright on Flint to the lineup. Home haunts like this one are the heart of NYC Halloween — built by hand, run with love (and a love of scaring people), and every bit as intense as the big-ticket attractions.

Staten Island: Twisted Trails

Staten Island’s Twisted Trails takes the scares outdoors, where the darkness does half the work. Add in the borough’s legendary home haunts — Staten Island has some of the most over-the-top residential displays in the city — and you’ve got a full night of frights on one island.

Long Island: Bayville Scream Park

Just past the city line, Bayville Scream Park goes big: a full scream park experience with multiple attractions, live actors and the works. It’s worth the trip if you want a whole evening built around getting scared.

New Jersey: Brighton Asylum

Across the Hudson, Brighton Asylum rounds out the list for anyone willing to cross state lines for their frights. New Jersey’s haunt scene punches well above its weight, and this one is a favorite.

Don’t Sleep on the Home Haunts

Beyond the big names, there are wild home haunts scattered across Staten Island, Queens and Long Island — elaborate residential setups that rival professional productions. Part of the fun is discovering them: follow local haunt maps and community pages, and plan a drive-by night to see how far your neighbors are willing to go.

Whether you’re into professional scare mazes or grassroots garage haunts, this is the month to get out there. Bring a friend — you’ll want someone to grab onto. And if you’re planning a full fall itinerary, save the dates for NYC’s 2026 holiday tree and lights celebrations coming right after spooky season, or check what else is happening around the city this week.

Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: Counting the Days Until the Rockettes Christmas Spectacular Lights Up Radio City Again

It is only October, but I am already counting the days. Every year it is the same with me: the minute the calendar flips toward the holidays, my thoughts drift to Radio City Music Hall and the Rockettes Christmas Spectacular. Some people have a favorite song or a favorite recipe. Mine is a show.

What gets me is how personal something so enormous can feel. The Rockettes Christmas Spectacular fills one of the most famous theaters in the world, and it has been running long enough to become part of New York’s own mythology. Yet sitting in that audience, you don’t feel like a tourist in a production. You feel like you have been invited into something familiar. The lights go down, the music starts, and suddenly you are a kid again waiting for Christmas morning.

The Rockettes themselves are the reason. Their dancing is precise in a way that almost stops your breath. Every kick, every turn, every formation lands exactly where it should, and the famous kicklines are more than a trick. They are proof of what happens when people move with one shared purpose: thirty-plus dancers, one rhythm, one heartbeat. You can see the hours of practice in every second of it, and that makes it more moving, not less.

For me the show is tied to family. My parents gave me Christmas as a feeling, not just a date on the calendar. Decorating the house, opening gifts, sitting around a table that was somehow never big enough for everyone: those are the memories I carry. My grandmothers added another layer, the older stories, the recipes, the small rituals that tell you who you are and where you come from. Watching the Rockettes, I think of them. A tradition gets its power from the people you share it with, and this one has been shared by generations of mine.

That is the quiet magic of the Christmas Spectacular: it works for everyone in the room at once. Children love the color and the movement. Parents appreciate the music and the craftsmanship. Grandparents see a tradition that has kept its elegance across the decades. Finding one evening that delights an eight-year-old and an eighty-year-old at the same time is rare. This show does it.

Radio City helps. Walking into that theater feels like stepping inside Christmas itself: the scale, the detail, the sense that someone built this place just for celebration. The costumes sparkle, the scenes turn over with energy, and the music wraps around the whole room. Some moments are playful, some are graceful, some are almost still. Together they build something you carry home with you.

In a time when most entertainment happens on a screen, I think that is worth protecting. Live performance asks you to be present, and presence is the whole point of the holidays. The best Christmas traditions were never complicated. They were simple things, repeated with love, year after year.

So yes, I am counting the days until the Rockettes are back at Radio City Music Hall. Not just for the dancing, though the dancing is beautiful. I am counting down to the feeling: family, memory, gratitude, and the bright certainty that some things stay joyful no matter how much the world changes.

Originally published on Times Square Chronicles.

Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: 16 of the Best Spicy Tofu Spots in NYC for Heat Lovers

If you think tofu is bland, you haven’t had it the New York way. This city’s spicy tofu game runs deep — from Korean kitchens ladling out bubbling soondubu jjigae to Sichuan spots where the mapo tofu hits with that signature numbing heat. Here are eight standouts worth putting on your list first.

Where the heat is

Mountain House in the East Village and Spicy Moon, also in the East Village, both lean into the spice-forward side of the menu. Over in Koreatown, Cho Dang Gol and BCD Tofu House are the go-to names for Korean-style tofu stews done properly — the kind that arrive still bubbling in the stone pot.

For Sichuan heat, Chuan Tian Xia in Sunset Park brings the fiery, numbing peppercorn kick, while Café China in Midtown pairs old-school décor with a serious mapo tofu. Hupo in Long Island City and Antidote in Williamsburg round out the list for the Brooklyn and Queens crowds.

Soondubu or mapo? Why not both

Soondubu jjigae is the comfort pick — silky soft tofu in a spicy broth, usually with seafood or pork, served screaming hot. Mapo tofu is the bolder one: cubes of tofu in a chili-and-Sichuan-peppercorn sauce that builds as you eat. New York does both well, which is half the fun of working through a list like this.

Planning a full day out? Pair your tofu crawl with 20 fun things to do in NYC today, from salsa socials to outdoor movies. And if you’re in the mood for a film after dinner, DreamWorks’ Forgotten Island is the warm family pick of the season.

Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: 10 of the Best Burritos in NYC, From the Bronx to Rockaway Beach

New York’s burrito scene doesn’t get the credit it deserves. Between the California-style monsters loaded with fries, proper Mission-style wraps, and spots rolling everything by hand in fresh flour tortillas, there’s a serious burrito within reach no matter which borough you’re in. Here are ten worth saving for your next craving.

The borough-by-borough hit list

Electric Burrito (East Village) and Son del North (Lower East Side) cover Manhattan’s downtown core, while Summer Salt in Flatiron holds it down further uptown. Brooklyn is stacked: Los Burritos Juárez in Fort Greene, Vato in Park Slope, B’KLYN BURRO in Clinton Hill, and two Bushwick favorites, La Abuelita and Plaza Ortega.

Don’t skip the outer boroughs. Taqueria Tlaxcalli reps the Bronx, and Super Burrito out in Rockaway Beach is the one to hit when the weather’s good and you want your burrito with an ocean view.

California vs. Mission: know your styles

The California-style burrito is the maximalist — carne asada, fries, cheese, guacamole, all of it. The Mission style is the San Francisco classic: rice, beans, meat, salsa, neatly wrapped and built to be eaten with two hands and full commitment. New York does respectable versions of both, plus plenty of hybrids that don’t care about the rules.

Make it a full outing with 20 fun things to do in NYC today — grab a burrito, then catch a salsa social or an outdoor movie. Film fans can check our review of DreamWorks’ Forgotten Island for an evening pick.